Beyond the village green, the King’s Head pub stands proudly, its stone facade contrasting with the overcast sky. A row of houses with red-tiled roofs lines the street, their windows reflecting the muted light. Behind the village, a large, misty hill, Roseberry Topping, dominates the landscape, its peak almost shrouded in fog. The overall atmosphere is one of quiet tranquility, with the mist adding a touch of mystery to the scene.

Crime, Concealment, and Moral Panic in Newton-under-Roseberry

On the 6th of November, 1847, the Yorkshire Gazette regaled its readers with a dark tale from the village of Newton-under-Roseberry.

“Concealment of Child Birth. — On Saturday last, the body of a newly born female child was found in a privy, in the village of Newton-under-Roseberry, by a person named Jackson, who nailed fast the privy door, walled up the hole through which he was taking the soil, and then proceeded to Stokesley inform the coroner. On his return to Newton, to his surprise he found the body was gone, whereupon he again went to Stokesley, and informed police superintendent Thompson, who found that the mother of the child was a young woman of the name of Christiana Dawson, servant to Mr. John Bailey, farmer, of Newton. On being accused of the offence, she at once admitted it, and has been committed, but afterwards admitted to bail to appear and take her trial at the next assizes for this county.”

It seems we may never know the fate of Miss Dawson, whose “crime” was to be both unmarried and in difficulty. Modern readers may view her circumstances as tragic, though Victorian society had its own quaint ideas on the subject. One imagines Christiana had few options available, beyond confessing all to the parish and hoping for an ounce of compassion—a quaint notion at best. There are, it must be said, cases in which parish officials deigned to hand over a few coins to support unwed mothers. But sympathy was rare, and for the most part, society regarded these women as perfectly deserving of their plight.

The mere threat of an illegitimate child was enough to drive many women to conceal their condition for as long as possible. It is not difficult to understand why, given that discovery was likely to bring a barrage of moralistic lectures, pressure to name the father, and a healthy dose of social ostracism. Some women resorted to hiding their pregnancies outright, leading to outcomes that could be, as in Christiana‘s case, tragic. The law held that only unmarried women were capable of infanticide; presumably, matrimony was thought to confer both sainthood and maternal instinct.

The attitude towards unmarried mothers depended somewhat on their social station. In some parts of the country, illegitimacy rates were, by all accounts, surprisingly high. This might be attributed to economic hardship rather than to moral laxity, though the middle classes preferred to think otherwise. The word “bastard” was liberally applied, especially by parish officials, whose support for illegitimate children tended to be grudging at best and ceased the moment the child could be shipped off to a respectable apprenticeship.

A life of servitude awaited many young women and, it is difficult to imagine a child being welcomed in that line of work by their employers. Middle- and upper-class families preferred their scandals wrapped in euphemism and sent off quietly to distant relatives, ensuring that all was forgiven provided no one said a word.

In the end, society contrived its little hypocrisies to preserve appearances, and women like Christiana bore the consequences. Her story is but one of many, a testament less to personal failure than to the pressures imposed by a world eager for scapegoats and untroubled by tragedy, so long as it unfolded in the servants’ quarters.


Posted

in

,

by

Tags:

Comments

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *